点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
回家，过年！******
“啥时候回来呀？”
“啥也别买，你回来就行。”
“到哪啦？”
“不着急，等你们回来吃饭！”
……
你有多久没回家了？
最想念的人是谁？
一位母亲在院子里
一遍一遍地扫着自家大门口，
时不时看向门口的路。
不知过了多久，
一名男生背着吉他出现在门口，
母亲激动地抱住儿子，
儿子抱起母亲，转了又转。
男生接受采访时表示：
“后来，我在监控里看到，
妈妈在门口等了有三四个小时，
眼泪哇哇地流……”
一女子和看养自己长大的大伯说
过几天带着一家回去过年。
第二天，
监控里看到大伯在庭院里洗洗晒晒，
床单被子晒满了院子，
直至把全部被子晾晒好后，
朝着监控深深望去……
一女子驾车返乡，
因堵车严重且已是凌晨，
便未通知家人自己的位置。
到达时，
发现12名家人站在路边等候。
女子说：
“很感动，
这真的是我一点也没想象到的！”
外出打工的父母回家过年，
两个孩子得知消息便一直在家等待。
一直没睡的孩子们听到父母的声音，
立刻飞奔出来，
一头扑进父母的怀里。
父亲表示：
“不管在外面受了多大委屈，
看到那一刻，真的什么都值了！”
一对双胞胎萌娃站在门口，
看到爸爸回到家的那一刻，
她们惊喜尖叫，手舞足蹈，
嘴里一直叫着
“爸爸爸爸……”
一名在外务工的女子
瞒着爸爸提前回家。
当傍晚天黑，
干完活回家的爸爸
突然看到她从屋里走出来，
两只手握紧，一时间忘了说话，
脸上绽放出淳朴又惊喜的笑容。
“怎么可能还会有石榴呢？”
一名男子回家，
发现父亲将石榴埋在沙土里，
专程等自己回来吃。
男子表示，
父亲将这些石榴从中秋埋到了元旦，
拿出来吃的时候还很新鲜。
一名女子悄悄回家过节，
开门的姥姥认出后，
上前一把抱住外孙女，
激动得不停地拍打着她。
这一抱，胜过千言万语。
小时候，
总想着离家远一点，
以为这样才会有自由，
不用每天听长辈们的唠唠叨叨。
长大后发现，
家才是最温暖的地方，
每一句唠叨，其实都是关心与爱，
在外奔波的辛苦与劳累，
在回到家的那一刻，烟消云散。
“我们总会绕啊绕，
绕几千里路也望向归途……”
相聚、拥抱、惊喜、泪目……
总有一刻让你感受到
回家的意义。
春节临近，
有人盼你回家，就是最大的幸福！
你今年在哪儿过年？
哪一瞬间让你觉得“回家真好”？
评论区聊聊吧！
中国新闻社(CNS1952)综合自中国新闻网、中新视频、人民视频、新华网、九派新闻等
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)